The use of “Bharat” instead of “India” on official G20 Summit invitations has sparked a debate about whether the country’s name should be changed.
Here are points to understand the controversy in G20 Summit:
- The term “Bharat” is mentioned in the Constitution of India as an alternate name for the country.
- The use of “Bharat” has been advocated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological mentor of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
- The government has not yet made any official announcement about changing the country’s name.
- The Opposition has criticized the move, calling it a “diversionary tactic” by the BJP.
- Some people believe that changing the country’s name would be a costly and unnecessary exercise.
- Others argue that it would help to promote India’s national identity and cultural heritage.
- The debate is likely to continue until the government makes a final decision.
G20’s “Bharat” vs. “India” Sparks Controversy
More Read About
G20 Summit in India: Debuting as ‘Bharat’ on Global Stage
The term “Bharat” is more ancient and reflects the country’s rich history and culture.
It would help to distinguish India from other countries with similar-sounding names, such as Indonesia and Pakistan.
It would be a way to reclaim the country’s identity after centuries of colonial rule.
It would be a costly and unnecessary exercise.
It would create confusion and inconvenience for people who are used to calling the country “India.”
It would be seen as a divisive move by some people.
The debate over the renaming of India is likely to continue for some time. It is a complex issue with no easy answers. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to change the country’s name will be up to the Indian people
Source: NDTV.Com